Still bugged in 5.3.5:

Fer wrote: Language (2 times: I have to re-set English during setup and afterwards within the software)
Temporary files location
Start folder

But at least it remembers display ICC profile and the "Do not show intermediate results" option.

Strage, we fixed it quite long ago and just tested again: the settings stay the same after reinstall. What exactly changes when you install new version?

Just about everything:

Language (2 times: I have to re-set English during setup and afterwards within the software)
Temporary files location ...

6 months later, we're now at v5.3.4 and this very, very annoying bug is still here!!

Please, fix it!!

No, it's not fixed.

It still:

- resets each and every setting/preference, forcing the user to a tiresome re-set of everything
- ignores the language chosen during setup, forcing the user to re-set the correct language and thus re-start the software

Please, fix it! I reported these bugs many ...

Thank you Stas!
I hope you fixed the "reset all settings to default every time a new version is installed" issue, too.

Fernando

Hello,

which are the changes between 5.2.16 and 5.3.1 beta?
I'm interested in the Pro X64 version in particular.

Thanks!

Fernando

I just upgraded my HF license to Pro X64, and I want to congratulate once more for this excellent application.

I use HF primarly to stack film scans, in order to overcome film flatness issues; so what I do is scanning the same frame 3 to 6 times with different scanner focus settings (evenly spaced ...

Hello,
I was using an oldish Helicon Focus Lite, Windows version (I registered in 2007; I think it was about 4.2x) and results were OK; I mainly use Helicon Focus to get max DOF in near-field pictures (say 2.0m to 15m, 50mm lens).
My typical stacks required settings along the lines of Radius = 3 ...

Helicon Focus starts in a strange language (this has to be Polish, then).
In the end I managed to get the language back in English, but I never changed any default during the installation, so it has to be some kind of bug in the setup scripts.

Fer

Yes, this is already clear from the help file, thanks.

Fernando

Well, that's impressive.

Anyone who uses a hi-resolution film scanner (expecially Nikon SuperCoolscans and Minolta 5400) knows that even slightly curled film produces bad scans, with either the center or the borders out of focus.
Those scanners have very thin DOF and it shows, even for apparently ...

Hello,

is it better to apply the unsharp mask on each frame before composing with HF, or is it better to postpone it on the final image?
Does it affect the precision of the algorythm?

Thanks,

Fernando