I hope you were able to see in my composite, that the image had soft spots, but the original pictures of those areas were NOT soft. So what do you have to say about that please?

Thanks I have a sample for you of a typical failure.
You will see that closest photo 2980, and farthest photo, 2986, did not contribute.

Cant get into ftp upload:

heliconsoft.com/ftp.html
upload, no password

thanks i can respond to this in the autumn. Meanwhile, can you give us a summary of what "options" might solve these problems, or is that detailed in the help notes?

You know, the fastest way to lose "support" is to give no support. 12 days waiting now. Practically every attempt I make is seriously flawed. What next? Use me to improve your product, or ignore me to lose your fan base.

The bigger I make these, the more critical the rendering, the more areas I find of fuzz from program failure. Can you give us some advice on this, settings?
I'd like to sell 40x30's, but i cant have lots of unpredictable fuzzy areas, and wow, it is a LOT of work to go in a fix them manually in ...

Still want to hear from Dan on this please

what are we supposed to do when we get all these double edges?

Please note that I am referring to the parts of the final blending vs. the same parts of the chosen element. Certainly the over all result is fantastic. I am asking if up close, does each part of the blend always get the best part of every element? Sometimes mine do not; they "miss" by a little, and ...

Does your software blending degrade the original sharpness of the original pictures at all? Because some frames might be nearly as sharp as others, I would think the opportunity to fool the software would be very high.

This is a very clever piece of software. Thank you for making it.
Can you say a ...

How about telling us the thinking that you decide to offer these 2 methods?

I am anxious to hear the exact same answer too