Perhaps I'm the last person in the HF universe to adopt this workflow, but if not, sharing with others.
In the past I've always shot .raw/.nef -only- on my macro insect stacks. I figured, why bother with .jpg?
And a deep 100+ image stack, even with the new and faster HF9, and a very capable CPU, can ...
Search found 50 matches
- 07.05.2026 19:52
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Sharing a method to dramatically speed HF workflow
- Replies: 0
- Views: 294
- 27.04.2026 18:24
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 460
Re: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
hi again el48tel and catherine,
i appreciate the additional info.
i have been getting very good results with my current optical setup, and of course HF9 for stacking..the latest HF release is terrific!
(here is a recent photo i took of a the eye of a hoverfly with bits of yellow pollen stuck here ...
i appreciate the additional info.
i have been getting very good results with my current optical setup, and of course HF9 for stacking..the latest HF release is terrific!
(here is a recent photo i took of a the eye of a hoverfly with bits of yellow pollen stuck here ...
- 27.04.2026 01:42
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 460
Re: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
thanks el48tel.
i just shot a ~500 image stack of the fine hairs above the eye of a fly...
i shot the stack at 2Mu steps...Mity 10x + DCR 150 + 180mm tube, on Nikon Z7...
then processed in HF B/1/1 three times...selecting "every image," "every other image," and "every third image"...
ie effectively ...
i just shot a ~500 image stack of the fine hairs above the eye of a fly...
i shot the stack at 2Mu steps...Mity 10x + DCR 150 + 180mm tube, on Nikon Z7...
then processed in HF B/1/1 three times...selecting "every image," "every other image," and "every third image"...
ie effectively ...
- 26.04.2026 03:22
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 460
Re: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
thank you both, catherine and el48tel for your tips and suggestions.
im familiar with allan walls. will revisit him.
i realized, belatedly, that there’s a super simple way to test this empirically…
i’ll shoot a deep stack at a very small step size… 1 or 2Mu…
then just run HF a few times…keeping ...
im familiar with allan walls. will revisit him.
i realized, belatedly, that there’s a super simple way to test this empirically…
i’ll shoot a deep stack at a very small step size… 1 or 2Mu…
then just run HF a few times…keeping ...
- 25.04.2026 18:41
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 460
Is there hard data on optimal step distance?
I’m using HF very successfully in conjunction with a Stackshot rail, a Z9, twin SB900 flashes at very low power to achieve 1/10,000th approx effective shutter speeds, a Mity 10x + tube lens optics, and with everything bolted down, to create very solid flawless insect images. I’m generally using step ...
- 20.04.2026 19:25
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: How to correctly use "check selected" function?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 222
Re: How to correctly use "check selected" function?
yayyyy!
perfect:)
i had not tried that sequence.
THANKS.
perfect:)
i had not tried that sequence.
THANKS.
- 20.04.2026 18:44
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: How to correctly use "check selected" function?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 222
How to correctly use "check selected" function?
I have deep (several hundred image) insect stacks...at single-digit micron steps...
for which I would like to select -all- images to stack for key sections of the stack (eyes perhaps)...
but then every other, or perhaps every third image to stack, for other visually less-important sections of the ...
for which I would like to select -all- images to stack for key sections of the stack (eyes perhaps)...
but then every other, or perhaps every third image to stack, for other visually less-important sections of the ...
- 16.04.2026 19:46
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: HF 9.0.2 throwing an Adobe DNG convertor error?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 799
Re: HF 9.0.2 throwing an Adobe DNG convertor error?
You are 500% right, Catherine.
I was foolish to have thought AI slop would have anything to offer in resolving a scenario like this. (And I'm a tech guy even.)
Digging in a bit more to the error messages I was getting...
I realized that my Helicon Focus cache folder was the issue--my issue---and ...
I was foolish to have thought AI slop would have anything to offer in resolving a scenario like this. (And I'm a tech guy even.)
Digging in a bit more to the error messages I was getting...
I realized that my Helicon Focus cache folder was the issue--my issue---and ...
- 15.04.2026 22:12
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: HF 9.0.2 throwing an Adobe DNG convertor error?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 799
HF 9.0.2 throwing an Adobe DNG convertor error?
I just upgraded from HF 8.3.11 pro lifetime to HF 9.0.2...
And HF 9.0.2 is consistently stopping mid-stack and throwing the errmsg
<red exclamation mark> Stacking error DNG Converter exited with error code 3221225477
relevant info:
* Adobe DNG converter is freshly installed and healthy. I ran a ...
And HF 9.0.2 is consistently stopping mid-stack and throwing the errmsg
<red exclamation mark> Stacking error DNG Converter exited with error code 3221225477
relevant info:
* Adobe DNG converter is freshly installed and healthy. I ran a ...
- 15.04.2026 04:24
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: Quick HF 9 upgrade question
- Replies: 2
- Views: 254
Re: Quick HF 9 upgrade question
outstanding!
thanks very much
thanks very much
- 15.04.2026 01:27
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: Quick HF 9 upgrade question
- Replies: 2
- Views: 254
Quick HF 9 upgrade question
I'm an HF pro lifetime licensed user...still running HF 8.3.11
I'm unclear on the upgrade path/process to HF beta 9.*
Do I download/install HF 9 first, then pay any additional upgrade charge?
Or what?
thx
I'm unclear on the upgrade path/process to HF beta 9.*
Do I download/install HF 9 first, then pay any additional upgrade charge?
Or what?
thx
- 14.04.2026 22:38
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Quick/obvious wrt HF retouching
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1808
Re: Quick/obvious wrt HF retouching
wow...i really appreciate the quick reply catherine.
im running HF 8.3.11
and yes...<Fn>+<Page Up/Down> is the key.
that works perfectly!
I'd tried multiple other combinations--except for that one.
thank you very much for the superior customer support!
im running HF 8.3.11
and yes...<Fn>+<Page Up/Down> is the key.
that works perfectly!
I'd tried multiple other combinations--except for that one.
thank you very much for the superior customer support!
- 14.04.2026 22:09
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Shutter setting during focus bracketing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 375
Re: Shutter setting during focus bracketing
Just a footnote to the good suggestion from @BobStone. I'm a Nikon Z7/Z9 shooter...and I'm shooting deep stacks with dual SB900 flash units. Unfortunately, if you're using flash, Nikon disables the "silent shutter" option. I realize in most use cases, if you have big honkin' flash going off, "silent ...
- 14.04.2026 22:01
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Macro
- Topic: Quick/obvious wrt HF retouching
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1808
Quick/obvious wrt HF retouching
When i retouch a deep (300+ image) stack, I find it more accurate to go through the "source image" pane, and select the layer to use, versus using F9, which for some reason does not work well or accurately on my system.
Mousing/selecting one-by-one is cumbersome and super slow.
And a scroll wheel ...
Mousing/selecting one-by-one is cumbersome and super slow.
And a scroll wheel ...
- 02.02.2025 03:54
- Forum: Helicon Focus: Support
- Topic: errmsg: "Failed to create dng file"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 18073
Re: errmsg: "Failed to create dng file"
thank you and will do.
i really appreciate the quick reply:)
i really appreciate the quick reply:)